- In contrast to wmii, dwm is only a window manager, and nothing else.
- Hence, it is much smaller, faster and simpler.
+ As founder and main developer of wmii I came to the conclusion that
+ wmii is too clunky for my needs. I don't need so many funky features
+ and all this hype about remote control through a 9P service, I only
+ want to manage my windows in a simple, but dynamic way. wmii never got
+ finished because I listened to users, who proposed arbitrary ideas I
+ considered useful. This resulted in an extreme <a
+ href="http://www.jwz.org/doc/cadt.html">CADT</a> development model,
+ which was a mistake. Thus the philosophy of dwm is simply <i>to fit my
+ needs</i> (maybe yours as well). That's it.
+ </p>
+ <h4>Differences to ion, larswm, and wmii</h4>
+ <p>
+ In contrast to ion, larswm, and wmii, dwm is much smaller, faster and simpler.